@Article{MuelbertSouzLewiHind:2013:FoHaSo,
author = "Muelbert, M{\^o}nica M. C. and Souza, Ronald Buss de and Lewis,
Mirtha N. and Hindell, Mark A.",
affiliation = "Instituto de Oceanografia, Funda{\c{c}}{\~a}o Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, RS, Brazil and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and Centro
Nacional Patag{\'o}nico — CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Argentina and
Marine Predator Unit, Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies,
University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia",
title = "Foraging habitats of southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina,
from the Northern Antarctic Peninisula",
journal = "Deep-Sea Research. Part 2. Topical Studies in Oceanography",
year = "2013",
volume = "88-89",
pages = "47--60",
keywords = "southern elephant seal, Mirounga leonina, areas of restricted
search, northern and western Antarctic Peninsula.",
abstract = "Elephant Island (EI) is uniquely placed to provide southern
elephant seals (SES) breeding there with potential access to
foraging grounds in the Weddell Sea, the frontal zones of the
South Atlantic Ocean, the Patagonian shelf and the Western
Antarctic Peninsula (WAP). Quantifying where seals from EI forage
therefore provides insights into the types of important habitats
available, and which are of particular importance to elephant
seals. Twenty nine SES (5 sub-adult males SAM and 24 adult females
AF) were equipped with SMRU CTD-SLDRs during the post-breeding (PB
2008, 2009) and post-moulting (PM 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010) trips to
sea. There were striking intra-annual and inter-sex differences in
foraging areas, with most of the PB females remaining within 150
km of EI. One PB AF travelled down the WAP as did 16 out of the 20
PM females and foraged near the winter ice-edge. Most PM sub-adult
males remained close to EI, in areas similar to those used by
adult females several months earlier, although one SAM spent the
early part of the winter foraging on the Patagonian Shelf. The
waters of the Northern Antarctic Peninsula (NAP) contain abundant
resources to support the majority of the Islands SES for the
summer and early winter, such that the animals from this
population have shorter migrations than those from most other
populations. Sub-adult males and PB females are certainly taking
advantage of these resources. However, PM females did not remain
there over the winter months, instead they used the same waters at
the ice-edge in the southern WAP that females from both King
George Island and South Georgia used. Females made more benthic
dives than sub-adult malesagain this contrasts with other sites
where SAMs do more benthic diving. Unlike most other populations
studied to date EI is a relatively southerly breeding colony
located on the Antarctic continental shelf. EI seals are using
shelf habitats more than other SES populations but some
individuals still employ open water foraging strategies. Sea-ice
was also very influential for PM females with more foraging
occurring in heavier pack-ice. Larger females used areas with
heavier ice-concentration than smaller females. The study
demonstrates the importance of shelf and slope habitat to elephant
seals, but also highlighted the influence of sea-ice and
fine-scale bathymetry and local ocean condition in determining
foraging habitat.",
doi = "10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.009",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.009",
issn = "0967-0645",
label = "lattes: 0537824080913130 2 MuelbertSouzLewiHind:2013:FoHaSo",
language = "en",
targetfile = "DSR-II_Muelbert et al_2013.pdf",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2012.07.009",
urlaccessdate = "01 maio 2024"
}